Wednesday, January 23, 2013

"...with all their rights and appurtenances for the remission of our sins" [3rd Oct 1213]

>
"......
When you walk into a court and see this flag you are put on notice that you are in a Admiralty Court and that the king is in control. Also, if there is a king the people are no longer sovereign. You're probably saying this is the most incredible thing I have ever heard. YOU have read the proof, it will stand up in court. But wait, there is more, you probably would say, how could this happen? Here's how. Admiralty law is for the sea, maritime law govern's contracts between parties that trade over the sea. Well, that's what our fore-fathers intended. However, in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiralty law could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337, 345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850 and they said:
"The committee also alluded to "the great force" of "the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution...." - Ibid. H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850)
............."

From: URL: http://www.barefootsworld.net/admiralty.html


    Remember the pope as "Christ's vicarious" hence the self-claimed "vicarious" of the heavenly King of kings [Jesus the Lord] on earth. 


    Sometimes someone of those earthly kings [also queens, see the history of the same United Kingdom] opposed to the "vicarious" [for example see Eastern Prussia history] and therefore were not so dangerous towards people's sovereignty in an historical perspective
    Eliminating those earthly kings was a job done also in the name of a misinterpreted "people's sovereignty" but for the final benefit of the "vicarious".

    Reflect.

[In references the old thread I opened in the old The Unhived Mind about 3rd Oct 1213 indulgencet - the starting point]. 

 Wednesday, January 23, 2013


Vatican money in London ["British" Maritime Admiralty law] 

 http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.it/2013/01/vatican-money-in-london-british.html


---------------REFERENCES:
  

BRITISH EMPIRE & AMERICA, A VATIKAN PROPERTY SINCE OCTOBER 3RD, 1213.

http://inpursuitofhappiness.wordpress.com/...roman-conquest/

http://inpursuitofhappiness.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/part-16-vatican-continuation-of-roman-conquest/
Posted: Oct 3 2007, 11:04 AM

 Avles

 Advanced Member


Group: Members
Posts: 264
Member No.: 401
Joined: 17-September 06



Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III, concerning England
(1198-1216), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1956. Page 177
“….so that those provinces which from of old have had the Holy Roman Church as their proper teacher in spiritual matters should now in temporal things also have her as their peculiar sovereign. You, whom God has chosen as a suitable minister to effect this, by a devout and spontaneous act of will and on the general advice of your barons have offered and yield, in the form of an annual payment of a thousand marks, yourself and your kingdoms of England and Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, the Holy Roman Church and to us and our successors, to be our right and our property as is stated in your official letter attested by a golden seal, the literal tenor of which is as follows:
‘John, by the grace of God king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, count of Anjou, to all the faithful of Christ who may see this charter, greeting in the Lord.
‘By this charter attested by our golden seal we wish it to be known to you all that, having in many things offended God and Holy Church our mother and being therefore in the utmost need of divine mercy and possessing nothing but ourselves and our kingdoms that we can worthily offer as due amends to God and the Church, we desire to humble ourselves for the sake of Him who for us humbled Himself even unto death; and inspired by the grace of the Holy Spirit not induced by force nor compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and on the general advice of our barons we offer and freely yield to God, and to SS Peter and Paul His apostles, and to the Holy Roman Church our mother, and to our lord Pope Innocent III and his catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom of Ireland with all their rights and appurtenances for the remission of our sins and the sins of our whole family, both the living and the dead. And now, receiving back these kingdoms from God and the Roman Church and holding them a feudatory vassal, in the presence of our venerable father, lord Nicholas, bishop of Tusculum, legate of the Apostolic See, and of Pandulf, subdeacon and member of household fealty henceforth to our lord aforesaid, Pope Innocent, and to his catholic successors, and to the Roman Church, in the terms hereinunder stated; and we have publicly paid liege homage for the said kingdoms to God, and to the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul, and to the Roman Church, and to our lord aforesaid, Pope Innocent III, at the hands of the said legate who accepts our homage in place and instead of our said lord, the Pope; and we bind in perpetuity our successors and legitimate heirs that without question they must similarly render fealty and acknowledge homage to the Supreme Pontiff holding office at the time and to the Roman church. As a token of this our perpetual offering and concession we will and decree that out of the proper and special revenues of our said kingdoms, in lieu of all service and payment which we should render for them, the Roman church is to receive annually, without prejudice to the payment of Peter’s pence, one thousand marks sterling five hundred at the feast of Michael and five hundred at Easter that is, seven hundred for the kingdom of England and tree hundred for the kingdom of Ireland, subject to the maintenance for us and our heirs of our jurisdiction, privileges, and regalities. Desiring all these terms, exactly as stated, to be forever ratified and valid, we bind ourselves and our successors not to contravene them; and if we or any of our successors shall presume to contravene them, then, no matter who he be, unless on due warning he come to his senses, let him lose the title to the kingdom, and let this document of offer and concession remain ever valid.
‘I, John, by grace of God king of England and lord of Ireland, will from this hour henceforward be faithful to God and Saint Peter and the Roman Church and my lord Pope Innocent III and his catholic successors. I will not take part in deed, word, agreement, or plan whereby they should lose life or limb or be treacherously taken prisoners; any injury to them, if aware of it, I will prevent and will check if I can; and otherwise, I will notify them as soon as possible, or inform a person whom I can trust without fail to tell them; any counsel they have entrusted to me either personally or by envoys or by letter I will keep secret, nor will I wittingly divulge it to anyone to their disadvantage. I will help in maintaining and defending, to the utmost of my power, against all men, the patrimony of Saint Peter, and particularly the kingdom of England and the kingdom of Ireland. So help me God and the Holy Gospels of God whereon I swear.
‘To prevent any questioning of these terms at any time in the future, and for the greater surety of our offer and concession, we have caused this charter to be made and to be sealed with our golden seal; and as tribute for this the first year we pay a thousand marks sterling to the Roman Church by the hand of the said legate. (The witness were listed here), signed October 3, 1213



>>>>> Comment of avles.

Do you understand now why Jesuits & Freemasonry created the Kommunism? Why Karl Marx theorized that the ‘willing’ doesn’t exist? Why he said that it is only a ‘over structure’ of the material world and the result of the clash between classes?
The history, by Marx and the Hegelian materialistic dialectic boys, is only an ‘impersonal’ product of an ‘impersonal’ history.
But this is exactly what the real plotters want to achieve and to spread in the minds in order to hide their ‘willing’. Not only Marxism helps to hide the guelph feudal hand on the world stating that ‘feudalism is a death passage in the human history’, making you believe that capitalists for real are an economic class – and not the man of straw of Black Nobility & Vatikan. Marxism is also an ideological ‘implant’ in your mind – like the ones of the ‘aliens’ - to avoid you think generally that behind the events of the world there’s a mind and a willing. The cretinism of the Marxism, that continues today fresh and vigorous as 150 years ago (I can guarantee for Vatikan Italy, as I read from ‘alternative’ sources…), is to make you believe that if you are wounded by a gun (= an important event happened in history) this is NOT cause the hand and the man that pushed the trigger (= the plot, the plan, the engineering of events), but only the bullet is guilty, or you are guilty because you were standing ‘on the bullet fly path’ as the shooting is an ‘impersonal event’ outside any kind of ‘willing’.

Interesting is to consider how they divided the Marxism (=Kommunism) in two factions (usual Hegelian/Jesuit dialectics), the Red ones (=usual kommies) and the Black Kommunists, i.e. the Fascists and the Nazis. The first believe the human events as an ‘impersonal’ product, the second believe in the existence of the ‘willing’ behind them, but they put it in different bodies, helping the criminals with a false witness in front of the world of public opinion court commiting so a balsphemy against God. The most preferred scapegoats are the Jews, and this is the reason for which they were never completely exterminated (meanwhile many heresies, less and less dangerous than the Jew one, were completely annihilated; about Cathars today you have neither the DNA….). If the Jews disappear completely, who will be used as scapegoats? The Buddhists?

So this is the first problem when you spread this vital news among people, you encounter people without illness, deafness, etc. But their minds and their souls are full of ideological implants of Jesuits (if not pure feces of the Antichrist): they hear you but they don’t listen to you.

Best regards from a North Adriatic Anti-catholic isolationist

avles
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“We don’t teach to honour and venerate the virgin Mary and the saints…Or to make out of them images of idols and gods, to pray them for clemency and mercy for the sins in every disgrace, to build them churches, donation offer, all that God, angels and saints severely forbid.
But demons, which assume the image of angels, goddess virgin Mary and saints and appear to ignorant popes, bishops, parishes and monks, to old witches and to the prostitute of the parishes and of the monks, impose them to be bigot, to torment themselves, to fall to the ground,… and to all these people the demons announce that now on this, now on a different mountain, on the field, or in the forest, churches have to be built, in order to bring there donations and to celebrate masses, in order to bring there wealth from everywhere, and every kind of cattle; and if they don’t do that, the goddess Mary and the saints will destroy with lightning all the corn-fields and the vineyards and will kill them with the plague.”
Father Primoz Trubar (father of the modern Slovenia and founder of the Slovenian Protestant Church, 1508 - 1586).


No comments: