Now comes the next step: tapping into “shallow” information sources. By “shallow”, I mean sources that have not been codified as hierarchical knowledge. These could be lists and tables of data, such as location and opening times of stores, or geopolitical information. They could also be the Internet itself, using today's search engines with the Cyc knowledge pool guiding the framing of the search question and the interpretation of the web pages that are found. Thus, asking whether two politicians from different states met during 2005 would first trigger a search for their names plus terms such as “meeting”, “summit” etc., as well as the requested date. Web pages that are retrieved by this search are scanned to see whether appropriate sentences indeed appear in them. If there isn’t evidence for such a meeting, Cyc would generate text strings to determine where each politician was during 2005. If it finds a date when both politicians were in the same city, Cyc could use its knowledge regarding the roles and relationships of the politicians to determine whether it is likely that a meeting had been set for that date. Cyc also detects contradictions between different web pages, as well as contradictions between its own knowledge pool and whatever it finds in its searches, so that it can assign “levels of confidence” to the answers it produces.
From: Thursday, June 24, 2010 - Defining 'Common Sense'
An hypotesis on how can work the ontological filter is based on the substitution of the bold characters sentence with the sequent: If there is evidence for such a meeting,
In this case, if I want to hide a meeting between two politicians during 2005, the ontological filter will search the elements which can put in relation one politician with another under any kind of relation which satisfy the assumption "meeting between them in 2005", in order then to deny its visibility from that PC of that IP to control.
#1: the ontological filter works mainly for the opposite finality of what publicly declared
#2: at the opposite of what publicly declared, ontological filter CYC-like are just at work, probably since the birth of internet the same
#3: internet was developed in order to manipulate the "common sense" which in its turn is the key to realize the Roman Catholic NOS/NWO
#4: the censorship in China, Iran, etc. are useful to build a "common definition" of censorship; if China and Iran do censorship, it measn that at the opposite in the Western world it doesnt' exist censorship. But here it doesn't exist simply because the "common sense" named it: thechnical failures/problems
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
(As I have no time, no resources, no money, no support at disposition, it is clear that what I wrote is affected by many errors and uncorrectness. I am not a prostitute lay journalist of this dirty Vatican 'tollerant' regime called 'democracy'. I have not the 51% of the Bank of America supporting my writings. I don't control the Casinò of Ostenda and neither Citroen and Peugeot as the General Superior did at least in 1958. So corrections and additions could appear in the future)